People often wonder why I paint the pro-choice movement out to be "evil". The short answer is because it is.

The long answer, however, deserves some looking at. We know—because I've laboriously written about it before in order to futilely avoid any whining—that not all pro-choicers are reflections of the pro-choice movement. This is seen by the obvious fact that not all pro-choicers believe that a woman has the right to a partial-birth abortion. However, their spokespeople do.

Not only that, but the spokespeople are against any kind of reasonable legislation that would not only make it harder for a woman to abort (no matter her age or mental state) but that would even delay it by four seconds. The only question Planned Parenthood wants women who are aborting to be asked is, "Will you be paying with cash or check?" (You could add "Nathan's Tax Dollars" to that as well.)

While I'm sure that the pro-choicers ultimate intentions are admirable (no unwanted children), we are expected to ignore their means which they use to get to their ends. They try to frame the sides of the debate thusly: Pro-Choicers are against unwanted pregnancy; pro-lifers are against choice. Well OK!

Really, pro-lifers are against unwanted pregnancy as well. We just have a problem with the pro-choicers' solution: kill unborn children. The "let's kill babies" position is made out to be the logical position, when really no sane person should be thinking that it is OK to kill another innocent human being. Really, their position would be a lot more logical if they at least advocated killing unwanted born-people as well. But they don't.

Pro-choicers are quick to get snippy when their logic is used with anything other than a human fetus. Apparently there is an "obvious" difference between a fetus who will be a drain to society and a homeless person who is already worthless in society. Point this out, and they scream that you are going too far (as well as claim that you are for killing homeless people).

The reasons for child-killing the pro-choicers use are all smokescreens. "Rape and incest", "population", "abuse" and many more are always used. Notably, pro-choice advocates don't use "selfishness" or "not ready to have a child" very often. For that kind of honesty you have to visit the really crazy pro-choicers' blogs where they're actually honest about their positions. But really, it doesn't matter what the reason is for NARAL: there is no abortion they don't like (except perhaps forced-abortions abroad, but even then we're waiting for an official statement).

But most people—even pro-choice people—are not like that. They also don't realize that their movement is so extreme. But it doesn't really matter. The pro-choice movement is evil because it advocates child-killing. No one hesitates to call the Nazis evil. But how could we compare the killing of 1.5 million children every year to what the Nazis were doing? That's obviously different!

Indeed, it's easy for 21st century Americans to look upon the Nazis and Germans of the 1940s with moral disdain; we have hindsight. To us, there's simply no way we could be as morally depraved than them! We're an enlightened people in an enlightened time. But what do we think the Germans thought? Perhaps it is because of this delusion that we are not willing to view the pro-choice movement as evil: because many people we know (if not most) identify themselves with it. Aunt Clara isn't evil! Burt the janitor isn't evil! (And especially) I'm not evil!

The pro-choice movement in the United States stands for child-killing, meaningless sex without consequence, protecting rapists and exposing children to lewd "sexual information". They cannot fathom a world in which women are prohibited from killing their children right up until the moment of birth. Such a denial of "rights" sends them into furious fits of rage. So yes, the pro-choice movement is evil, as well as those who participate in it. We all have wickedness in us, and thankfully the Lord has given us a way out of evil. Child-killers and advocates of such are included in His mercy, on the condition of repentance.