If a woman is attacked, and her unborn baby (or twins) is killed, should the gunman be charged with murder?

Many pro-choicers have no problem saying, "Yes," because the babies were wanted by the mother and even if they weren't, it wasn't an abortion. Sorry guys, but this is another example of your movement being extreme while you are not.

Case in point, brought to my attention by Jill Stanek, Katherin Shuffield of Indiana was shot and wounded while on the job at a bank by a bank robber. Her unborn babies are dead.

The Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that a wrongful death suit cannot be brought for killing an unborn child, regardless of whether the baby is viable. This was in the wake of a drunk driving accident a few years back when a nearly full-term baby died.

Indiana law also does not define "viability" in reference to its fetal homicide or manslaughter laws. We believe we have identified a murder case in which the courts accepted viability as being 24 weeks.

It appears that fetal battery charges may be the only charges that can be brought.

Several legislators have worked throughout the last two years to correct these problems, but the core issue in Indiana is that our Democrat-controlled House kills every pro-life bill that it gets.

So because the babies were not "viable" (meaning they cannot survive outside of the womb) they are considered unworthy of justice. Sounds like a pro-choice world to me. Jill makes a good point though: "I questioned this, since the doctors decided to deliver the babies, meaning they thought the babies stood a better chance of surviving outside their mother's uterus than inside... meaning they were potentially viable."

Not that it matters whether or not they were viable: they were killed by a non-abortionist, and the mother was not planning on aborting them. Can you imagine what this mother is going through, wounded from being shot and not being able to have justice for her children? The robber remains to be caught. The babies were five months-old, no where near the pro-choice scientific definition of "blob of tissue". (See picture.)

The only reason this is an issue is because of abortion.

Pro-choice advocates, from the feminists and organizations like NARAL and Planned Parenthood, are very, very glad that the robber cannot be charged with murder, as they have openly stated time and time again that such laws would "endanger" a "woman's right to choose".

These people are insane. Even though the babies were wanted and the mother had no intention of aborting. "Sorry, babe. Take a back seat for our agenda next to the blacks. We wouldn't want you and your children being brought to justice to endanger promiscuous teenagers in any way." Women who get knocked up and "exercise their right to choose" are considered heroines and yet a woman who survives getting shot and the loss of her children is potentially a menace to the right to choose. It's nice they care about women, isn't it?